Internet Watch Foundation
Report Illegal Content
IWF News: Comprehensive interview with IWF addresses key questions
Thu, 11th June, 2009
* How to use this site
* Public Area
* About the IWF
* Mission and Vision
* Role and Remit
* INHOPE
* Issues outside IWF (FAQs)
* IT & HR Professionals
* Blocking
* IWF URL list recipients
* FAQs
* Complaints Procedures
* Awards
* Achievements
* IWF Website Feedback
* Media Centre
* Corporate Area
* Police and Law
* Government
* Members
* Charity
Site Search
Funded By
PayPal
Further Links
* About IWF
* IWF Accountability
* IWF Governance
* IWF Status
* Self-regulation
Page Tools
* Big Font Size
* Print Page
* Bookmark Page
* Email Page
Communications
* About IWF
* FAQs
* Contacts
* Make a Donation
* IWF Newsletter
* IWF Website Feedback
* IWF Literature
Feature
2008 Annual Report Launched
Feature
IWF TV and Online Advert
Homepage > Public Area > Blocking
IWF Facilitation of the Blocking Initiative
IWF's core function is as an internet 'Hotline' service for the public to report their inadvertent exposure to potentially illegal online content within our remit and as the national 'notice and take-down' body for that content.
Despite success in almost eradicating such content from being hosted on UK networks indecent images of children are still available around the world so the commitment by our members to voluntarily prevent the accidental download of such content by working to deploy a list on their services has been welcomed in many quarters. This industry-led initiative has gathered pace since 2004 and more of our members have chosen to make use of this service, namely, internet service providers, mobile operators, search providers and filtering companies. National and international law enforcement agencies and Hotlines who are members of INHOPE can also have access to the list.
As a result of work by our analysts, potentially illegal child sexual abuse content URLs are regularly added to our list. This list is dynamic and comprehensive: updated twice a day. The Protection of Children Act 1978 as amended in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, makes it an offence to take, make, permit to be taken, distribute, show, possess with intent to distribute, and advertise indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children under the age of 18. The ‘making’ of such images includes downloading, that is, making a copy of an indecent image of a child on a computer so in the UK accessing such content online is a serious criminal offence.
The list typically contains less than 1000 live child sexual abuse URLs at any one time. This initiative is designed to reduce the occasions when innocent internet users might be exposed to traumatic and unlawful images, however it may also help to:
* Diminish the re-victimisation of children by restricting opportunities to view their sexual abuse.
* Disrupt the accessibility and supply of content to those who may seek out such images.
* Disrupt the dissemination of images to UK internet users for commercial gain by criminal organisations.
Unfortunately, the blocking mechanism cannot put an end to offenders abusing children or distributing images of child sexual abuse on the internet. This initiative is one element in a wider effort to combat the making and distribution of images of child sexual abuse via the internet and the activities of determined criminals who exploit internet-based technologies and services to this end. This effort involves a partnership between law enforcement, children’s services, major children’s charities, the judicial system and the UK internet industry.
Blocking is designed to protect people from inadvertent access to potentially illegal images of child sexual abuse. No known technology is capable of effectively denying determined criminals who are actively seeking such material: only removal of the content at source can achieve that goal.
Our systems and processes in compiling this list are periodically inspected and validated by eminent independent professionals and found to be consistent with best practice. There is a procedure whereby the website owner of any blocked URL has the right of appeal. The URLs are assessed according to UK law, a process reinforced by reciprocal police training with each image being categorised in line with criteria set out by the UK Sentencing Guidelines Council. Details of every URL with child sexual abuse content are passed with accompanying intelligence to our Hotline and law enforcement partners around the world so they can investigate the hosting of such content in their countries under their own legislation.
Blocking facilitated by the use of our list applies only to URLs related to child sexual abuse content on publicly available websites. We have no role in the investigation of suspects therefore tackling the distribution of child sexual abuse content through other channels such as peer-to-peer is the role of our police partners. IWF has no plans to extend the type of content included on the list.
Vernon Coaker MP, Minister of State responsible for policing, crime and security
“I have been impressed by the efforts of the UK internet industry in raising the bar in online safety and I am particularly encouraged by indications that their commitment to voluntarily block their customers' access to sexually abusive images of children online is already leading to less content reported to the 'Hotline' being confirmed as child sexual abuse. Around 95 per cent of those with residential broadband connections in the UK are now protected in this way and I commend this and other positive steps taken by many companies, in conjunction with the Internet Watch Foundation, to better protect internet users, and internet services, from abuse."
Blocking FAQs
We recognise that we have responsibility to provide as much information as possible regarding our facilitation of the industry-led blocking initiative therefore we hope these FAQs can address any queries associated with our role in the process.
From this page you can also access information about:
IWF
IWF Status
IWF Governance
IWF Accountability
Self-regulation
Page Created: Wed, October 26th, 2005
Page Modified: Tue, April 21st, 2009
Back to Top
About IWF | FAQs | Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Site Credits
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 Internet Watch Foundation. All Rights Reserved. Web Design by Chameleon Studios.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
CHILLING EFFECT
Chilling Effects
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Monitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Participants and Contacts Printer-friendly version
Quick Search:
Site Guide
Clearinghouse Topic Areas:
# ACPA
# Anticircumvention (DMCA)
# Copyright
# Copyright and Fair Use
# Court Orders
# Defamation
# Derivative Works
# DMCA Notices
# DMCA Safe Harbor
# DMCA Subpoenas
# Documenting Your Domain Defense
# Domain Names and Trademarks
# E-Commerce Patents
# Fan Fiction
# International
# John Doe Anonymity
# Linking
# Patent
# Piracy or Copyright Infringement
# Protest, Parody and Criticism Sites
# Responses
# Reverse Engineering
# Trade Secret
# Trademark
# UDRP
# Uncategorized
This Topic: Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
About Us:
The Chilling Effects Clearinghouse collects and analyzes legal complaints about online activity, helping Internet users to know their rights and understand the law. Chilling Effects welcomes submission of letters from individuals and from Internet service providers and hosts. These submissions enable us to study the prevalence of legal threats and allow Internet users to see the source of content removals.
Chilling Effects aims to support lawful online activity against the chill of unwarranted legal threats. We are excited about the new opportunities the Internet offers individuals to express their views, parody politicians, celebrate favorite stars, or criticize businesses, but concerned that not everyone feels the same way. Study to date suggests that cease and desist letters often silence Internet users, whether or not their claims have legal merit. The Chilling Effects project seeks to document that "chill" and inform C&D recipients of their legal rights in response.
The Chilling Effects Clearinghouse is a unique collaboration among law school clinics and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Conceived and developed at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society by Berkman Fellow Wendy Seltzer, the project is now supported by clinical programs at Harvard, Berkeley, Stanford, University of San Francisco, University of Maine, George Washington School of Law, and Santa Clara University School of Law clinics, and the EFF.
The participating clinics are listed below, with the topic areas for which each has primary responsibility. We appreciate the hard work of these organizations, their directors, professors, and law students.
See below to contact the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse.
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/
Topic Areas: ACPA, Domain Names and Trademarks, Trademark, UDRP
*
Wendy Seltzer, Chilling Effects Project Leader
*
Diane Cabell, Berkman Fellow
Participants
DePaul University College of Law
DePaul University College of Law
http://www.law.depaul.edu/institutes_centers/ciplit/
Topic Areas:
*
Barbara Bressler
Participants
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Frontier Foundation
http://www.eff.org/
Topic Areas: Linking
*
barak
*
Cindy Cohn
*
Allison Navone
Participants
EFF's work on the Chilling Effects Project is supported by the San Francisco Foundation. The San Francisco Foundation
George Washington University Law School
George Washington University Law School
http://www.law.gwu.edu/
Topic Areas: Copyright and Fair Use
*
Dawn Nunziato
Participants
Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic
Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic
http://www.samuelsonclinic.org/
Topic Areas: Anticircumvention (DMCA), DMCA Safe Harbor, Reverse Engineering
*
Jack Lerner
*
Laura Quilter
*
Jason Schultz
*
Jennifer Urban
Participants
Santa Clara University School of Law High Tech Law Institute
Santa Clara University School of Law High Tech Law Institute
http://hightechlaw.scu.edu/
Topic Areas: Trade Secret
*
santaclaralaw
*
Alexa Horne
Participants
Stanford Center for Internet & Society
Stanford Center for Internet & Society
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/
Topic Areas: Derivative Works, Fan Fiction, John Doe Anonymity, Piracy or Copyright Infringement
*
Jennifer Granick
Participants
University of Maine School of Law
University of Maine School of Law
http://tlc.usm.maine.edu/
Topic Areas: E-Commerce Patents, Patent
*
Rita Heimes
Participants
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
http://www.internetjustice.org/
Topic Areas: Copyright, Defamation, Documenting Your Domain Defense, Protest, Parody and Criticism Sites
*
Jennifer Dupre
*
Jonathan Kerry-Tyerman
*
Robert Talbot
Participants
Contact Us:
Please send your inquiry to one (and only one) of the addresses below.
*
Add scanned images or comment to a Cease and Desist Notice you have entered in the database: notices@chillingeffects.org (please reference the NoticeID in the subject line)
You may also send notices by fax or mail:
Fax: +1 415 436 9993
eFax: +1 413 702 3884
Postal Address:
Chilling Effects
Electronic Frontier Foundation
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA
*
Send us a news update: news@chillingeffects.org
*
Report a technical problem with the website: webmaster@chillingeffects.org
*
Correct personally identifying information: privacy@chillingeffects.org
*
Other Questions: questions@chillingeffects.org
*
Press Inquiries: Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com +1.914.374.0613
Clinics at other law schools are invited to join the project. Please contact Wendy Seltzer, wendy@seltzer.com for more information about getting involved.
Link Us:
Please feel free to link to the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. If you wish, you may use the following image, linked to the homepage at http://www.chillingeffects.org/:
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Monitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Participants and Contacts Printer-friendly version
Quick Search:
Site Guide
Clearinghouse Topic Areas:
# ACPA
# Anticircumvention (DMCA)
# Copyright
# Copyright and Fair Use
# Court Orders
# Defamation
# Derivative Works
# DMCA Notices
# DMCA Safe Harbor
# DMCA Subpoenas
# Documenting Your Domain Defense
# Domain Names and Trademarks
# E-Commerce Patents
# Fan Fiction
# International
# John Doe Anonymity
# Linking
# Patent
# Piracy or Copyright Infringement
# Protest, Parody and Criticism Sites
# Responses
# Reverse Engineering
# Trade Secret
# Trademark
# UDRP
# Uncategorized
This Topic: Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
About Us:
The Chilling Effects Clearinghouse collects and analyzes legal complaints about online activity, helping Internet users to know their rights and understand the law. Chilling Effects welcomes submission of letters from individuals and from Internet service providers and hosts. These submissions enable us to study the prevalence of legal threats and allow Internet users to see the source of content removals.
Chilling Effects aims to support lawful online activity against the chill of unwarranted legal threats. We are excited about the new opportunities the Internet offers individuals to express their views, parody politicians, celebrate favorite stars, or criticize businesses, but concerned that not everyone feels the same way. Study to date suggests that cease and desist letters often silence Internet users, whether or not their claims have legal merit. The Chilling Effects project seeks to document that "chill" and inform C&D recipients of their legal rights in response.
The Chilling Effects Clearinghouse is a unique collaboration among law school clinics and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Conceived and developed at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society by Berkman Fellow Wendy Seltzer, the project is now supported by clinical programs at Harvard, Berkeley, Stanford, University of San Francisco, University of Maine, George Washington School of Law, and Santa Clara University School of Law clinics, and the EFF.
The participating clinics are listed below, with the topic areas for which each has primary responsibility. We appreciate the hard work of these organizations, their directors, professors, and law students.
See below to contact the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse.
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/
Topic Areas: ACPA, Domain Names and Trademarks, Trademark, UDRP
*
Wendy Seltzer, Chilling Effects Project Leader
*
Diane Cabell, Berkman Fellow
Participants
DePaul University College of Law
DePaul University College of Law
http://www.law.depaul.edu/institutes_centers/ciplit/
Topic Areas:
*
Barbara Bressler
Participants
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Frontier Foundation
http://www.eff.org/
Topic Areas: Linking
*
barak
*
Cindy Cohn
*
Allison Navone
Participants
EFF's work on the Chilling Effects Project is supported by the San Francisco Foundation. The San Francisco Foundation
George Washington University Law School
George Washington University Law School
http://www.law.gwu.edu/
Topic Areas: Copyright and Fair Use
*
Dawn Nunziato
Participants
Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic
Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic
http://www.samuelsonclinic.org/
Topic Areas: Anticircumvention (DMCA), DMCA Safe Harbor, Reverse Engineering
*
Jack Lerner
*
Laura Quilter
*
Jason Schultz
*
Jennifer Urban
Participants
Santa Clara University School of Law High Tech Law Institute
Santa Clara University School of Law High Tech Law Institute
http://hightechlaw.scu.edu/
Topic Areas: Trade Secret
*
santaclaralaw
*
Alexa Horne
Participants
Stanford Center for Internet & Society
Stanford Center for Internet & Society
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/
Topic Areas: Derivative Works, Fan Fiction, John Doe Anonymity, Piracy or Copyright Infringement
*
Jennifer Granick
Participants
University of Maine School of Law
University of Maine School of Law
http://tlc.usm.maine.edu/
Topic Areas: E-Commerce Patents, Patent
*
Rita Heimes
Participants
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
http://www.internetjustice.org/
Topic Areas: Copyright, Defamation, Documenting Your Domain Defense, Protest, Parody and Criticism Sites
*
Jennifer Dupre
*
Jonathan Kerry-Tyerman
*
Robert Talbot
Participants
Contact Us:
Please send your inquiry to one (and only one) of the addresses below.
*
Add scanned images or comment to a Cease and Desist Notice you have entered in the database: notices@chillingeffects.org (please reference the NoticeID in the subject line)
You may also send notices by fax or mail:
Fax: +1 415 436 9993
eFax: +1 413 702 3884
Postal Address:
Chilling Effects
Electronic Frontier Foundation
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA
*
Send us a news update: news@chillingeffects.org
*
Report a technical problem with the website: webmaster@chillingeffects.org
*
Correct personally identifying information: privacy@chillingeffects.org
*
Other Questions: questions@chillingeffects.org
*
Press Inquiries: Wendy Seltzer wendy@seltzer.com +1.914.374.0613
Clinics at other law schools are invited to join the project. Please contact Wendy Seltzer, wendy@seltzer.com for more information about getting involved.
Link Us:
Please feel free to link to the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. If you wish, you may use the following image, linked to the homepage at http://www.chillingeffects.org/:
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
